Do we formulate ideas to define the boundaries of self and thereby create constantly a newer and richer identity? Or is it a process of creating methods in ignorance in order to understand self from knowledge perspective? The twin divide of pervasive knowledge and the knowledge for identity is what sustains the humanity and through it's mutual tension, borrowing and dissolving does the history create itself with expressions of nations, cultures and professions.
2 टिप्पणियां:
Bhaiya you have explained evolution.
But what began evolution is still a mystery. Maybe there is no beginning.
Dear Vaibhav, Friedrich Nietzsche's 'god is dead' approach to morality as archetypical rather than cliched has connotations reverbrated in Upanishads and Swami vivekanandas vedantic principles in terms of need to search and define the self. And there could be no end to the search and definitions hence there could be no begining. Our linear model of thought oversimplifies the underlying possibilies of the construct of life. We force to think in cartesian terms of begining, growth and maturity.
एक टिप्पणी भेजें